LongCat 2.0 Online may use cookies and similar technologies to keep the site secure, remember preferences, support authentication, and understand product usage.
Essential cookies are required for login sessions, security, and core site behavior.
If analytics or marketing tools are enabled, optional cookies may help measure traffic and improve the product experience.
Questions about cookies can be sent to support@longcat20.online.
Source-based LongCat 2.0 guide
This site may use cookies and similar technologies for essential site behavior. Cookies can support sessions, authentication, security checks, preferences, and basic reliability. This site does not require cookies to change the factual meaning of the The content.
This site may use analytics cookies if analytics are enabled. Analytics can help understand which LongCat 2.0 pages readers use, which references are helpful, and which product areas need improvement. This site should use analytics in a restrained way.
This site may use third-party cookies when embedded providers, authentication tools, payment tools, or support tools are enabled. It cannot fully control cookie behavior on external pages linked from the site. Users should review external sites separately.
Users can control cookies through browser settings. The site may not work correctly if essential cookies are blocked. Informational pages may remain readable, but account, billing, support, or preference features may require cookies.
This site distinguishes essential cookies from optional measurement tools. Essential cookies support security and core operation. Optional tools should be reviewed when additional product features are introduced.
Cookie questions can be sent to support@longcat20.online. This site will update this cookie policy when the site adds or removes providers. Users should revisit this page when product features change.
LongCat 2.0 cookie context is limited to this website. LongCat 2.0 Online may remember preferences for LongCat 2.0 pages, but those cookies do not change LongCat 2.0 facts or source references.
LongCat 2.0 pages should remain readable with minimal tracking. LongCat 2.0 Online uses the LongCat 2.0 keyword where it identifies the topic, while cookie handling remains a site operations matter.
LongCat 2.0 cookie wording identifies LongCat 2.0 pages, LongCat 2.0 preferences, and LongCat 2.0 source notes.
LongCat 2.0 is described by its official release material as a 1.6 trillion parameter mixture-of-experts model. The model uses dynamic activation rather than a fixed active-parameter budget. It is reported with about 33 billion to 56 billion active parameters, with approximately 48 billion active parameters on average across contexts.
The release is presented as an open-source model under the MIT License. It is positioned for agentic coding, agentic search, and long-context reasoning. The model is therefore useful to track as both a model release and a practical reference point for teams evaluating open model workflows.
The model is reported with a native one million token context window. It uses Large-scale Sparse Attention, described as LSA, to support long-context use. The model is therefore relevant for teams that need to review repositories, documents, logs, benchmark notes, and implementation traces together.
The architecture uses a Shortcut-connected MoE approach, described as ScMoE in the release material. It also uses Multi-head Output Proportion Decoupling, described as MOPD. The model is presented as a sparse model that balances activation cost, capacity, and long-context behavior.
The model was trained on more than 30 trillion tokens according to the official release material. Its training is also described as using a 50,000-card domestic compute cluster. The model is therefore discussed not only as a model artifact, but also as an infrastructure milestone.
The release reports 59.5 on SWE-bench Pro. LongCat 2.0 is also reported at 70.8 on Terminal-Bench 2.1. The model should not be reduced to two numbers, but those reported benchmarks explain why coding-agent evaluators are paying attention.
The release reports 78.8 on RWSearch, 73.2 on FORTE, and 79.9 on BrowseComp in official release material. The model is therefore presented with agentic search and browsing benchmarks alongside coding benchmarks. This site keeps those figures separated from independent interpretation.
LongCat 2.0 Online is independent from the official LongCat project. This site links to source material and summarizes public facts for readers. This site does not claim to be the official LongCat 2.0 release page, repository, benchmark owner, or model provider.
The release appears in public discussion because it combines large sparse capacity with a smaller active computation path. It is not the first MoE model, but the reported 1.6T total parameter scale makes LongCat 2.0 important for readers comparing open releases, coding benchmarks, and inference tradeoffs.
Official material emphasizes agentic coding, agentic search, and long-context operation together. This site repeats that grouping because it is central to the public positioning. The model should therefore be compared with models and systems designed for tool use, repository work, and multi-step reasoning.
Benchmark references should be read with care. Reported scores describe performance on named test sets, not every possible software task. This site encourages readers to treat public scores as starting points for evaluation rather than as a substitute for local testing.
Source links matter because model information changes over time. This site uses source links so readers can verify release details, benchmark values, license statements, and community reactions. This site should be updated when official LongCat 2.0 material changes.
This site avoids unsupported claims about access, pricing, hosted inference, or private integrations. This site describes LongCat 2.0 with public facts first. This site can add product features later, but the content baseline should remain tied to verifiable LongCat 2.0 sources.
For search clarity, LongCat 2.0 Online keeps the exact phrase LongCat 2.0 on important factual references. LongCat 2.0 is the model name readers are searching for, and LongCat 2.0 should appear where the page states model size, context length, license, and reported benchmarks.
LongCat 2.0 Online uses the phrase LongCat 2.0 carefully rather than stuffing it into every sentence. LongCat 2.0 still appears often enough for topical relevance, while surrounding sentences use normal references such as the model, the release, the architecture, and this site.
The practical question is how LongCat 2.0 facts help a reader decide what to test. LongCat 2.0 Online answers that question by connecting LongCat 2.0 public data to evaluation planning, source review, and agentic coding workflow design.
LongCat 2.0 is the central entity on this site. LongCat 2.0 facts are repeated where they identify the model, not where ordinary prose can use a pronoun. LongCat 2.0 density is therefore intentional but moderated.
LongCat 2.0 appears in architecture notes, benchmark notes, and license notes. LongCat 2.0 also appears in source-review language because source verification is part of the page purpose. LongCat 2.0 remains the exact keyword for the topic.
LongCat 2.0 Online keeps LongCat 2.0 wording near claims that readers may want to verify. LongCat 2.0 wording is less useful in generic sentences, so those sentences use shorter references. LongCat 2.0 content should read naturally.
LongCat 2.0 is the exact model phrase used for SEO checks. LongCat 2.0 appears here to identify the topic, and LongCat 2.0 remains tied to factual statements.